Wednesday, January 16, 2008

Re-cycle the box

I was in a meeting with a client a while back along with several other consultants from different companies. Once again, the client was having a problem with their databases (of course!). They had several of each: SQL Server, DB2 and Oracle.

I'm rapidly forming the opinion that any consultant who concentrates on Oracle is nothing more than a corporate shill for Oracle. It seems that almost every solution they have to a database problem is to add another database, thereby increasing license fees for the client. Is there some grand, kick-back scheme or something that Oracle consultants get looped into? At least the people representing IBM and Microsoft product lines suggested investigating other solutions ranging from ETL software to messaging to web services. The Oracle guys went right for the throat and declared that yet another intermediate "consolidation" database instance was the answer. What a crock.

I looked across the table at the CIO and said, "If you are truly serious about solving your integration problem, get rid of one of your database platforms. Let them all know that the two who work together best get to stay." I also reminded him that the company owned all the tools they needed to solve the problem so, capital costs should be 0. I'm not sure if he is going to follow that strategy over the long term but, I certainly know that my suggestion kick-started some very, very creative and resourceful thinking amongst the other 3 groups of consultants!

2 comments:

Alastair Bathgate said...

Is that you, Bill?

Are you back in the blogosphere?

Great to "hear" your voice again.

Best
Al

wpbarr said...

Indeed it is, sir!